Hillary is one confused woman!

DNC, Lefties

Recently, the mention that Hillary Clinton had approached Bill Richardson and had told him that he shouldn’t back Obama, because he simply CANNOT win against McCain in November.

Well true to form, once the negative reactions surfaced about the statement, she and her campaign begin paddling upstream. In a recent interview she was asked the following, extremely SIMPLE non-loaded question.

“Did you tell Bill Richardson that Barack Obama can’t win?”

Now, being that she is a politician, she is physically incapable of answering “Yes” or “No” to even the most basic of questions, so she spent the next hour and a half (not REALLY) paddling around the question trying her best not to REALLY stick to the answer.

After she was done, the puzzled reporter responded with “So that’s a no?” and finally got out “that’s a no.” from Clinton.

Again, seeking to remain as Switzerland as possible on the answer, Hillary has come back out and said that she’s not officially denying that she told Richardson Obama couldn’t win and that she didn’t fully understand the question.

Yes, you read that correctly, Hillary Clinton was unable to fully understand a plain yes or no question about whether or not she made a comment to a close friend… and THIS is the woman who says she’s fully capable and ready to “pick up that phone” at 3AM in times of crisis.

Sounds an awful lot like someone else I know with a similar name… “that all depends on what the definition of IS is…”

So let me get this straight… no one heard you NOT say something to someone who may or may not be Bill Richardson? Give me a damned break, this woman would lie to your face about what time it was when she knew you were wearing a watch.

2 Comments

  1. nick  •  Apr 4, 2008 @10:11 AM

    Hey come on go easy on her, I am sure she just didn’t hear the question correctly. It is likely that with all the bombs and sniper bullets flying by her head in Bosnia she could have lost some hearing.

    But in all seriousness, I totally agree. She has lied about just about everything, and it’s all stuff that seems so trivial. Stuff like who she was named after or the sniper fire in Bosnia, there was no reason to lie about anything like that. No one would have looked down on her if those things didn’t happen, but now that she did say those things and got caught she looks ridiculous. Even this latest one, if she did say it, well hey it makes her look confident, if she didn’t well nothing to be said then. But the fact she has to lie about whether or not she did makes her seem very untrustworthy. If it so easy to lie about the “unimportant details, what about the big stuff?

  2. Scott  •  Apr 7, 2008 @5:25 PM

    another reason why I’m not voting for Billary

Leave a Reply

Allowed tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

By submitting a comment here you grant this site a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. For further information please see my Comments Policy.